[
Trump’s Immigration Agenda: Swift Actions and Controversial Plans
In his inaugural address, President Donald Trump outlined sweeping executive actions on immigration, including halting all illegal entry, returning millions of criminal aliens, and reinstating his "remain in Mexico" policy. In his first hours in office, Trump signed a slate of orders related to immigration, including a plan to end birthright citizenship in the United States.
According to Priscilla Alvarez, CNN’s immigration reporter, the Trump administration has taken swift action to restrict asylum seekers’ options. Within hours of Trump’s inauguration, the border app was shut off, effectively sealing off asylum at the U.S. southern border. This move has significant implications for migrants seeking refuge in the United States.
Alvarez noted that refugee admissions have also been canceled, affecting 10,000 people who were scheduled to come to the United States after undergoing a years-long vetting process. This move is part of the administration’s argument that they can target and immediately deport individuals.
The Trump administration has also redefined American citizenship, with an executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship. This move has sparked controversy, with some legal scholars arguing that the 14th Amendment of the Constitution provides an opening for the president’s plan. The order is not retroactive, applying only to individuals born in the United States going forward.
Alvarez characterized the Trump administration’s approach to immigration as "prepared" and "knowing what they want to do." The administration has been quick to implement changes, making quiet moves that signal their playbook going forward. The big question remains whether they have the resources and money to execute their agenda.
The Trump administration’s immigration agenda has sparked controversy and legal challenges, with many arguing that the moves are a departure from American values and principles. As the administration continues to implement its plans, it remains to be seen how these changes will impact individuals and families seeking refuge in the United States.
