The conservative Supreme Court is poised to leap into another culture-war battle between red states and blue states, this time involving the medical rights of transgender teens and their parents. Two years after the conservative majority overturned national abortion rights, the justices will hear arguments on Wednesday over whether states may ban hormone treatment and puberty blockers for adolescents suffering from gender dysphoria.
This page requires Javascript.
This case has been highly anticipated, with both sides presenting strong arguments. On one hand, some argue that states have the authority to regulate medical treatment for minors, including hormone therapy and puberty blockers, which can have long-term physical and emotional effects. On the other hand, proponents of the treatment argue that it is a medically necessary and effective way to help transgender youth alleviate gender dysphoria, a distressing condition that can have severe mental health consequences.
The case has drawn national attention, with many arguing that it is a matter of life and death for transgender youth. According to the Trevor Project, a leading organization that provides crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to LGBTQ youth, more than 40% of transgender and non-binary youth have attempted suicide in the past year.
The case is also seen as a test of the Supreme Court’s willingness to take on controversial social issues, following the court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and eliminated the federal right to abortion.
In the case before the court, a group of parents and organizations are challenging the policies of several states, including Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia, which prohibit or restrict hormone therapy and puberty blockers for transgender minors.
The parents and organizations argue that these policies are unconstitutional and that they violate the due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment. They also argue that the policies are medically harmful and that they will cause irreparable harm to transgender youth.
The Biden administration has filed a brief supporting the parents and organizations, arguing that the policies are unconstitutional and that they are harmful to transgender youth. The administration also argues that the policies are part of a broader trend of anti-LGBTQ discrimination and that they are motivated by a desire to “eradicate” the LGBTQ community.
The Supreme Court is expected to hear oral arguments in the case in the coming weeks, and a decision is likely to be issued in the summer. The outcome of the case is highly uncertain, but it is likely to have significant implications for the rights and well-being of transgender youth across the country.
