White House faces decision on Gabbard after shaky confirmation hearing
President Joe Biden is facing a tough decision on the confirmation of Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard as the United States Ambassador to New Zealand, following a contentious hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The hearing was marked by criticism and skepticism from senators, who grilled Gabbard on her support for authoritarian regimes and her record on human rights.
Gabbard, a former Democratic presidential candidate, is a vocal supporter of the current government of Sri Lanka, which has been accused of human rights abuses. She has also spoken out against international efforts to sanction the government, drawing criticism from human rights advocates.
During the hearing, committee members expressed concern over Gabbard’s positions on various issues, including her support for Viktor Orban’s government in Hungary, which has been accused of undermining democracy. Senator Bob Menendez, the committee’s chair, criticized Gabbard for her “disingenuous” approach to human rights, and Senator Chris Coons expressed frustration over her failure to condemn Orban’s anti-LGBTQ+ policies.
Gabbard’s supporters argue that she would be a strong advocate for human rights and that her experiences as a combat veteran and a small business owner give her a unique perspective on diplomacy. However, her critics warn that her support for authoritarian regimes could undermine U.S. values and credibility around the world.
The White House has not publicly indicated how it will proceed with Gabbard’s nomination, but it is expected to face intense scrutiny and pressure from human rights groups and lawmakers in both parties. Gabbard’s confirmation would be a significant step forward for her political career, but it would also carry significant implications for the United States’ global reputation and its commitment to human rights and democracy.
